Is Switch 2’s 120 Hz Too Slow for 60 Hz Gaming?

In Tokyo, prominent hardware tester Michael Harrison conducted in-depth analysis of the much-anticipated Switch 2 console’s display performance. The device boasts a 120 Hz screen, a significant leap from its predecessor’s 60 Hz refresh rate, promising smoother visuals and enhanced gaming fluidity.

However, Harrison’s tests indicated a critical drawback: the response times of the Switch 2’s display do not meet expectations for 60 Hz gaming. Despite the doubled refresh rate, the panel’s delayed pixel transitions result in ghosting and motion blur that undermine the potential benefits of the higher refresh rate.

This revelation has raised concerns among both gamers and industry experts. Dr. Sophia Tanaka, a display technology specialist at Kyoto Institute of Technology, commented, “High refresh rates alone do not guarantee improved visual performance. Response time is equally vital; without fast pixel response, motion artifacts degrade the gaming experience.”

Nintendo has yet to officially address these findings. The slower response times could restrict competitive or fast-paced gaming, where visual clarity during motion is crucial. This situation highlights the complex balance manufacturers face when advancing display specifications.

As the gaming community eagerly awaits further updates, this case underscores the essential connection between refresh rates and response times. It serves as a reminder that technological upgrades must comprehensively enhance user experience rather than rely on isolated specifications.